Spreadtrum · 9.1.1

Spreadtrum supports Option 1 or Option 2 for UE functionality determination, requiring the associated ID to be configured for both training and inference to guarantee consistency. They oppose configuring only Set B resources for UE-side inference and argue that larger quantization steps should not be considered for NW-side model inference. For BM-Case 2, they propose reusing the TCI indication framework and supporting implicit time reporting, while allowing adaptive selection of reported beam counts. They require the associated ID to be configured in CSI-ReportConfig and oppose Alt.4 for performance monitoring, instead supporting dedicated monitoring configurations and Option 1 for training-inference consistency.

Spreadtrum advocates for UE-initiated data collection for UE-side models, opposes larger quantization steps for inference to maintain accuracy, supports up to 16 beams reporting per instance, and favors reusing existing CSI frameworks to minimize specification impact. They push against overly complex standardization solutions, advocating for simpler approaches like CRI/SSBRI-only beam information and implicit time reporting over more complex bitmap schemes.