R1-2409494 discussion

Discussion on LS on applicable functionality reporting for beam management UE-sided model

From CMCC
Status: not treated
WI: NR_AIML_air
Agenda: 5
Source: 3gpp.org ↗

Summary

CMCC analyzes the signaling procedures for applicable functionality reporting in NR AI/ML beam management, specifically addressing Steps 3-5 of the RAN2-defined lifecycle. The document presents 15 proposals and 2 observations, arguing that NW-side additional conditions should be optional and functionality-specific, while supporting both Option 1 (CSI-ReportConfig based) and Option 2 (inference parameter set based) procedures.

Position

CMCC proposes that NW-side additional conditions be functionality specific and optional, arguing that UE can determine applicable functionalities based on inference configuration or parameters provided in Step 3 without mandatory NW-side conditions. They support both Option 1 (using CSI-ReportConfig) and Option 2 (using independent inference parameter sets) for the reporting procedure, while explicitly opposing Option 3 due to signaling inefficiency. For Option 2, they prefer configuring the associated ID outside the CSI framework and independent from inference related parameters. Regarding activation, CMCC proposes that if inference configuration is provided in Step 3, functionalities should default to a deactivated mode requiring further activation indication, whereas Step 5 configurations can reuse existing CSI reporting activation mechanisms. They further argue that multiple applicable functionalities can be activated simultaneously under beam management use cases.

Key proposals

Your notes

Private to your account