InterDigital · 5
Incoming Liaison Statements ·
RAN1#120 · Source verification
Every position summary on this site is generated by an AI from the actual Tdoc contributions. This page shows you the exact source documents Claude read to produce the summary above, so you can verify it yourself. Click any Tdoc ID to view its detail page, or click "3gpp.org ↗" to read the original on the official 3GPP server.
Contributions at RAN1#120 · 2 docs
Reply LS to SA2 on AIML data collection
Position extracted by Claude
InterDigital, representing RAN2, clarifies that NG-RAN involvement in UE-side data collection is limited to providing radio measurement configuration, specifically for the beam management use case, while explicitly stating that RAN2 has not concluded on the level of NG-RAN involvement in the actual data transfer process. They define standardized data as content explicitly defined in 3GPP specifications, ensuring the network can understand its meaning, and assert that full MNO visibility allows verification of collected versus reported data without requiring an SLA. RAN2 opposes the assumption that gNB or LMF are in charge of 'initiating, terminating and fully managing data transfer,' restricting their role to configuration provision. They state that roaming considerations are outside RAN2 scope and that the impact of full controllability on UE normal operation has not been evaluated. The position emphasizes that data collection initiation and configuration remain under network control, with the specific determination method still FFS.
Summary
This document is a Reply Liaison Statement from RAN2 to SA2 regarding AI/ML data collection for NR Air Interface, specifically addressing UE-side model training. It contains six distinct answers to SA2's questions concerning NG-RAN involvement in data controllability, the definition of standardized data, and MNO visibility, with no new technical proposals but rather clarifications of existing RAN2 agreements and scope boundaries.
Reply LS on AIML data collection
Position extracted by Claude
InterDigital reports that SA2 did not reach consensus on the feasibility of any of the outlined options (1b, 2, and 3) to meet the RAN requirements specified in LS RP-242389. They state that a full evaluation of potential solutions for all UE side data collection options would require further study in SA2. They emphasize that this study requires coordination with SA5, SA3, and RAN2. Consequently, they ask TSG RAN and TSG SA to take this lack of consensus and the need for further study into account.
Summary
InterDigital reports that SA2 did not reach consensus on the feasibility of standardized UE-side data collection solutions to meet RAN requirements specified in LS RP-242389. The document states that a full evaluation requires further study in SA2 and coordination with SA5, SA3, and RAN2, resulting in zero specific technical proposals.
Prior contributions at RAN1#118bis · 1 doc · Oct 14, 2024
LS on AIML data collection
Position extracted by Claude
InterDigital is advocating for a comprehensive framework that balances MNO control with standardized AI/ML data collection, pushing for solutions that ensure full MNO controllability and visibility while maintaining privacy compliance. They are seeking SA group input to resolve technical feasibility questions rather than taking a strong stance on any particular option.
Summary
This liaison statement from RAN to SA groups presents 4 options for AI/ML data collection for UE-side model training, seeking SA input by RAN#106 to resolve consensus issues on MNO controllability and UP tunnel feasibility. The document contains no formal proposals but establishes requirements and analysis framework for standardized data collection solutions.
How this was derived
Claude extracted the "position extracted" field above directly from each Tdoc during summarization.
Always verify critical claims against the original Tdocs linked above.