R1-2600041 discussion

Other aspects of 6GR physical layer operation

From Nokia
Status: not treated
WI: FS_6G_Radio
Agenda: 10.5.3.3
Release: Rel-20
Source: 3gpp.org ↗

Summary

This Nokia contribution discusses tracking reference signal (TRS) design for 6G Radio, presenting 3 Observations and 3 Proposals across sections 2 and 3. The document questions the need for a dedicated 6GR TRS, critiques overhead and channel characteristic mismatch issues with 5G periodic TRS, and proposes prioritizing aperiodic RS designs associated with downlink transmissions.

Position

Nokia questions the necessity of introducing a 6GR-specific TRS before use cases and corresponding requirements are clearly identified. They present a technical case against periodic TRS inherited from 5G, arguing that periodic TRS contributes to system overhead and network energy consumption and experiences different channel characteristics than PDSCH DMRS due to cell-specific wide-beam transmission versus UE-specific precoded transmission. Nokia proposes that 6GR should build upon aperiodic RS design associated with downlink transmissions that shares the same/similar radio channel characteristics as PDSCH DMRS. If TRS usage is retained, they propose studying mechanisms for more flexible TRS adaptation including not transmitting TRS or adapting TRS configuration/setting for overhead reduction and energy savings without compromising performance. Nokia identifies network-side lack of knowledge for timely TRS adaptation, noting such knowledge is available at the UE.

Key proposals

Your notes

Private to your account