R1-2600112 discussion

Discussion on 6GR synchronization acquisition and beam measurement

From Spreadtrum
Status: not treated
WI: FS_6G_Radio
Agenda: 10.5.1.1
Release: Rel-20
Source: 3gpp.org ↗

Summary

Spreadtrum/UNISOC provides 33 proposals and 5 observations on 6GR synchronization acquisition and beam measurement, advocating NR initial access procedures as the baseline while introducing enhancements for coverage, energy efficiency, and AI-based beam prediction. The document covers SSB structure, periodicity, sequence design, PBCH content, RMSI delivery, paging, on-demand signals, sync signal-less operation, cell DTX/DRX, and beam management across both idle and connected modes.

Position

Spreadtrum proposes that NR initial access procedures serve as the baseline for 6GR design with specific evolutionary enhancements. They argue that reducing 6GR sync signal bandwidth by a small margin does not significantly reduce sync raster entries but seriously degrades SSB receiving performance, and present evaluation results showing only 6% additional NES gain when extending SSB periodicity from 40ms to 80ms under zero load. They require same SCS between 6GR PSS/SSS and other channels/signals (except PRACH) for a given band across all frequency ranges, opposing different SCS for SSB versus other channels in FR2-1. They propose studying beam prediction for initial access (Sub-use case D) leveraging AI/ML experience from NR BM-Case 1 for both SSB spatial prediction (Set B subset of Set A) and beam refinement prediction (Set B different from Set A). They support introducing cell DTX/DRX operation in idle state and on-demand sync signals for both single-cell and multi-cell deployments, with NR SSB-less solutions as starting points for sync signal-less operation.

Key proposals

Your notes

Private to your account