R1-2600115 discussion

Discussion on downlink transmission scheme(s) for downlink control channels for 6GR

From Spreadtrum
Status: not treated
WI: FS_6G_Radio
Agenda: 10.5.2.1
Release: Rel-20
Source: 3gpp.org ↗

Summary

This document contains 78 proposals and 18 observations discussing 6GR PDCCH design, where Spreadtrum identifies NR limitations including insufficient CORESET duration (max 3 symbols), overlapping monitoring adaptation mechanisms, and three monitoring capability types increasing complexity, while proposing NR-based baseline with enhancements for coverage, simplified monitoring, and unified frameworks.

Position

Spreadtrum proposes inheriting NR PDCCH physical structure (CCE/REG/REG bundle framework, ALs 1/2/4/8/16, time-first REG mapping, hash-based search space) as baseline for 6GR. They prefer one port precoder-cycling between REG bundles for transmit diversity over SFBC, arguing comparable performance with simpler implementation. They propose studying longer CORESET duration (4/6/12 symbols) to address capacity in hotspot areas and coverage for narrow-bandwidth UEs. They require a unified framework for sub-slot/slot/slot group-level PDCCH monitoring to replace three separate monitoring capability types from NR, reducing UE and gNB implementation complexity. They propose studying a harmonized PDCCH monitoring adaptation mechanism, criticizing NR's overlapping functionalities (PDCCH skipping, SSSG switching, DCI format 2_6, PEI, LP-WUS) and suggesting alternatives like two-stage DCI or dynamic candidate indication by LP-WUS.

Key proposals

Your notes

Private to your account