FUTUREWEI · 10.5.0
General aspects and frameworks ·
RAN1#124bis · Source verification
the AI's delta
shifted
vs RAN1#124
FUTUREWEI shifted their intra-cell CA proposal from a proprietary '2-level CA framework redefining the serving cell concept to Method 1 adopting external Gothia cell terminology, integrating it with inter-cell CA that now explicitly includes FR1+FR2 non-collocated scenarios with possible DC-like realization. They hardened on 20MHz as the smallest maximum UE bandwidth for lowest-tier devices, adding a new technical argument that 5MHz HD-FDD devices cannot meet RAN peak data rate requirements and that economies of scale drive overall complexity. Added a new common initial-access framework proposal requiring DL and UL IA bandwidth to share center frequencies within the same carrier, supporting transition to post-IA wideband operation under both aggregation frameworks. Dropped earlier positions on coverage range metric, SCS/duplex mode studies, and initial-access energy efficiency mechanisms from the current contribution.
AI-synthesized from contributions · all text is paraphrased
Every position summary on this site is generated by an AI from the actual Tdoc contributions. This page shows you the exact source documents the AI read to produce the summary above, so you can verify it yourself. Click any Tdoc ID to view its detail page, or click "3gpp.org ↗" to read the original on the official 3GPP server.
Contributions at RAN1#124bis · 1 doc
6G General Aspects and Frameworks
Position extracted by AI
Futurewei proposes studying intra-cell carrier aggregation (Method 1 'Gothia cell') using multiple contiguous/non-contiguous physical carriers up to 400 MHz logical bandwidth, and inter-cell carrier aggregation including FR1+FR2 non-collocated scenarios with possible DC-like realization. They require prioritization of Option 1 as the clean reference for contiguous wideband operation, with Option 2 or Option 3 as practical implementation candidates subject to RAN4 feasibility. They propose that the smallest maximum supported RF and BB UE BW for lowest-tier devices is 20MHz, arguing that 5MHz HD-FDD devices cannot meet RAN peak data rate requirements and that overall device complexity is driven by economies of scale. They propose studying a common initial-access framework where DL and UL IA bandwidth share center frequencies and are contained in the same carrier, supporting transition to post-IA wideband operation under both aggregation frameworks.
Summary
Futurewei presents 7 proposals and 9 observations on 6G Radio frameworks, covering maximum bandwidth interpretations, UE 400MHz DL support options, intra-cell and inter-cell carrier aggregation, smallest maximum UE bandwidth for low-tier devices, and initial access design criteria for a unified 6GR framework spanning fragmented and contiguous spectrum deployments.
Prior contributions at RAN1#124 · 1 doc · Feb 09, 2026
6G General Aspects and Frameworks
Position extracted by AI
Futurewei proposes agreeing to Opt1 for SSB design with bandwidth larger than 3MHz and selecting a single maximum bandwidth option to limit device types and maximize economies of scale. They propose redefining the serving cell concept to support multiple carriers with intra-cell CA using one PCC for control/RRC and one or more SCCs for data exchange, forming a 2-level CA framework with inter-cell CA. For 400MHz support, they propose 2x 200MHz RF chains with 2x 8k FFT and consider 1x 400MHz RF chain. They argue coverage range in meters is the most direct metric rather than a single MCL/MIL/MPL value. They propose studying SCS options for around 15GHz and supporting TDD, FDD, SBFD, and HD-FDD duplex modes from day one, while further investigating SBFD/SSFD impact on frame structure. For initial access energy efficiency, they propose transmitting MIB/SIB1 with larger periodicities than synchronization signals or on-demand, supporting on-demand SSB/SIB1, and time-adaptive/flexible scalable PRACH from Day 1.
Summary
This Futurewei Tdoc for the 3GPP 6G Radio study presents 18 proposals and 4 observations across multiple physical layer framework areas. The document argues for a single large maximum bandwidth option, a 2-level carrier aggregation framework (intra-cell and inter-cell CA), support for multiple carriers per serving cell, and various energy efficiency improvements in initial access design. It also addresses coverage metrics, duplex types, NTN harmonization, and SCS options for higher bands.
How this was derived
The AI extracted the "position extracted" field above directly from each Tdoc during summarization.
For the delta summary at the top, the AI compared FUTUREWEI's consolidated stance at RAN1#124bis
against their stance at RAN1#124 and classified the change as
shifted.
Always verify critical claims against the original Tdocs linked above.