Spreadtrum · 10.5.2.3
Uplink transmission scheme(s) for uplink channels ·
RAN1#124bis · Source verification
the AI's delta
strengthened
vs RAN1#124
Spreadtrum hardened their 8-port stance from FFS status for CPE/FWA only to explicitly limiting Day 1 PUSCH ports to {1,2,4} with 8-port studied only for CPE/FWA, and added the argument that 8-port UEs have not been commercially used despite NR spec support. Their DMRS position was refined in two dimensions: the single DMRS type is now specified for UL only (previously both DL and UL), and the port count was narrowed from undefined maximum to up to 32 ports with explicit multiplexing methods FDM/TDM/CDM. New multi-TRP work appeared: requiring NR schemes as baseline with avoidance of multiple transmission schemes for similar scenarios, and proposing study of L1 UE aggregation and remote shared uplink panels. Their superimposed pilot stance was softened from opposes prioritizing to cautious stance requiring sufficient evaluation.' The AI/ML DMRS overhead reduction evidence was preserved with identical simulation claims (2-symbol vs 3-symbol DMRS). PUCCH simplification to two formats was dropped entirely from this submission.
AI-synthesized from contributions · all text is paraphrased
Every position summary on this site is generated by an AI from the actual Tdoc contributions. This page shows you the exact source documents the AI read to produce the summary above, so you can verify it yourself. Click any Tdoc ID to view its detail page, or click "3gpp.org ↗" to read the original on the official 3GPP server.
Contributions at RAN1#124bis · 1 doc
Discussion on uplink transmission scheme(s) for uplink channels for 6GR
Position extracted by AI
Spreadtrum proposes limiting 6G Day 1 PUSCH antenna ports to {1,2,4}, with 8-port studied only for CPE/FWA, arguing 8-port UEs have not been commercially used despite NR spec support. They propose a simplified unified uplink codebook supporting coherent type consumption, full power transmission, and symmetric/asymmetric UL panels, and study of frequency selective precoding for PUSCH. For multi-TRP, they require using NR schemes as baseline while avoiding multiple transmission schemes for similar scenarios, and propose studying L1 UE aggregation and remote shared uplink panels for performance enhancement. They propose a single DMRS type for UL supporting up to 32 ports with FDM/TDM/CDM multiplexing, and present simulation results showing AI channel estimation with 2-symbol DMRS achieves similar BLER to non-AI with 3-symbol DMRS, supporting DMRS overhead reduction sub-case A for Day 1 AI/ML. They take a cautious stance on superimposed pilot, requiring sufficient evaluation of multi-user interference and standardization impact before selection as priority use case.
Summary
Spreadtrum's contribution to 3GPP RAN1#124b provides 23 proposals and 5 observations on 6G uplink transmission schemes, covering PUSCH antenna ports, DMRS design with AI/ML overhead reduction, resource allocation, PUCCH formats, and new technologies like L1 UE aggregation and remote shared uplink panels.
Prior contributions at RAN1#124 · 1 doc · Feb 09, 2026
Discussion on uplink transmission scheme(s) for uplink channels for 6GR
Position extracted by AI
Spreadtrum proposes using NR closed-loop transmission (codebook-based and non-codebook-based) as the baseline for 6G PUSCH, but requires limiting 8-port transmission to FFS status for CPE/FWA only due to lack of commercial 8-port devices despite NR spec support. They propose studying a simplified unified uplink codebook with antenna port group configuration to cover full-coherent/partial-coherent/non-coherent types, full power mode transmission, and asymmetric UL panels simultaneously. For DMRS, they require defining a single DMRS type for both DL and UL to avoid implementation complexity from multi-type support, and they support DMRS overhead reduction sub-case A (sparse orthogonal DMRS in frequency and/or time domain) as a 6GR Day 1 AI/ML use case backed by simulation results showing AI channel estimation with 2-symbol DMRS achieving similar BLER to non-AI with 3-symbol DMRS. They oppose prioritizing superimposed pilot (SIP) as a use case pending further multi-user interference evaluation and standardization impact analysis. For PUCCH, they propose radical simplification from five NR formats to two formats (≤2 bits and >2 bits), eliminate sub-slot based PUCCH, two PUCCH configurations, semi-persistent PUCCH, and PUCCH SCell, while retaining PUCCH group concept and supporting proactive conflict avoidance for PUCCH resource determination.
Summary
This Spreadtrum/UNISOC contribution to 3GPP RAN1#124 contains 8 Observations and 26 Proposals addressing 6G uplink channel design. The document provides positions on PUSCH transmission schemes, DMRS design with AI/ML receiver enhancements, and PUCCH simplification, collectively advocating for a streamlined design philosophy that reduces NR complexity while selectively introducing new capabilities.
How this was derived
The AI extracted the "position extracted" field above directly from each Tdoc during summarization.
For the delta summary at the top, the AI compared Spreadtrum's consolidated stance at RAN1#124bis
against their stance at RAN1#124 and classified the change as
strengthened.
Always verify critical claims against the original Tdocs linked above.