RAN1 / #124bis / FS_6G_Radio / Verify

ZTE · 10.5.3.2

Aspects of uplink-based CSI acquisition · RAN1#124bis · Source verification
the AI's delta new vs RAN1#124
ZTE enters as a new contributor at RAN1_124bis with a multi-faceted position. They propose dynamic SRS resource reuse across UL CSI acquisition, DL CSI acquisition, and beam management to reduce configuration overhead versus 5G NR's per-usage configurations. They present a technical case against NR nested tree-like frequency hopping for wideband CSI acquisition citing phase discontinuity and channel aging, supported by BLER and SE simulation gains, and propose successive frequency hopping as a supplement. They question SRS carrier switching necessity specifically for non-CA single CC operation of DL CBW 400MHz around 7GHz. Their AI/ML work introduces comb-12 SRS achieving comparable performance to legacy comb-4 with a feasibility study focus on labeled data construction, model scalability/generalization, and computational complexity. They also require explicit antenna port mapping between SRS ports and PUSCH/PUCCH/DL Rx ports for UL Tx coherency, port selection, and DL CSI acquisition.
AI-synthesized from contributions · all text is paraphrased
Every position summary on this site is generated by an AI from the actual Tdoc contributions. This page shows you the exact source documents the AI read to produce the summary above, so you can verify it yourself. Click any Tdoc ID to view its detail page, or click "3gpp.org ↗" to read the original on the official 3GPP server.

Contributions at RAN1#124bis · 1 doc

R1-2601869 discussion not treated 3gpp.org ↗
Discussion on aspects of uplink-based CSI acquisition
Position extracted by AI
ZTE proposes a lean and streamlined 6GR SRS design where one SRS resource or transmission can be dynamically reused for multiple usages, including UL CSI acquisition, DL CSI acquisition, and beam management, to avoid the inefficiency of 5G NR's separate configurations per usage. ZTE requires explicit antenna port mapping mechanisms between SRS ports and PUSCH, PUCCH, and DL Rx ports to ensure UL Tx coherency, port selection, and accurate DL CSI acquisition. ZTE argues that the 5G NR nested tree-like frequency hopping pattern is infeasible for wide-band CSI acquisition due to phase discontinuity and channel aging, and proposes introducing a successive frequency hopping pattern as a supplement, supported by BLER and SE simulation gains. ZTE questions the necessity of SRS carrier switching in 6G to avoid redundant features and requires that SRS carrier switching mechanisms not be considered for the non-CA single CC operation of DL CBW 400MHz around 7GHz. ZTE presents simulation results showing AI/ML-based SRS with comb-12 achieves comparable performance to legacy comb-4 SRS but proposes a feasibility study focusing on labeled data construction, model scalability/generalization, and computational complexity.
Summary
This ZTE contribution discusses the design of the 6G RAN (6GR) SRS, providing 4 observations and 18 proposals across 6 sections. The document advocates for a lean, unified, and flexible SRS framework covering resource configuration, coverage/capacity, frequency hopping, DL CSI acquisition, and AI/ML use cases, with a strong emphasis on enabling a single SRS resource for multiple usages and introducing successive frequency hopping.

Prior contributions

ZTE has no prior contributions to 10.5.3.2 in the meetings currently tracked. This is either a new contributor to this sub-topic or the earliest meeting in our history.
How this was derived
The AI extracted the "position extracted" field above directly from each Tdoc during summarization. For the delta summary at the top, the AI compared ZTE's consolidated stance at RAN1#124bis against their stance at RAN1#124 and classified the change as new. Always verify critical claims against the original Tdocs linked above.