Nokia · 10.6.2
Uplink WUS and operation ·
RAN1#124bis · Source verification
the AI's delta
strengthened
vs RAN1#124
Nokia hardened their opposition to a dedicated low-power BS receiver module from opposes to a definitive statement that none is foreseen for 6G BS hardware.' They refined the UL WUS signal reuse requirement by enumerating specific signals per RRC state: PRACH preamble for Idle/Inactive, and SRS, UL DMRS, SR, PUCCH, PUSCH for Connected—specificity absent from the prior position. A new technical case against DS#1a was added, citing the unresolved issue of UL WUS transmit power determination without DL pathloss estimation from PSS/SSS and the need for spectrum regulation confirmation on UE transmission without DL sync signals. Two new study proposals were added: conditional reuse of stored system information to avoid redundant MIB/SIB1 acquisition, and on-demand reference signals triggered by UL WUS for SCell operations and cell switch mobility. The earlier argument to postpone the study due to duplication with PRACH/RACH is dropped.
AI-synthesized from contributions · all text is paraphrased
Every position summary on this site is generated by an AI from the actual Tdoc contributions. This page shows you the exact source documents the AI read to produce the summary above, so you can verify it yourself. Click any Tdoc ID to view its detail page, or click "3gpp.org ↗" to read the original on the official 3GPP server.
Contributions at RAN1#124bis · 1 doc
On Uplink WUS and corresponding operation
Position extracted by AI
Nokia proposes that the UL WUS signal type should reuse existing uplink signals: PRACH preamble for RRC Idle/Inactive UEs and existing uplink signals/channels (SRS, UL DMRS, SR, PUCCH, PUSCH) for RRC Connected UEs. They argue against a dedicated low-power BS receiver module for UL WUS, stating none is foreseen for 6G BS hardware, and require that the UL WUS signal utilize the common radio modem to minimize operational cost. Nokia questions the feasibility of DS#1a due to the unresolved issue of UL WUS transmit power determination without DL pathloss estimation from PSS/SSS, and requires confirmation from spectrum regulations on whether a UE can transmit without first receiving DL synchronization signals. They propose studying a UL WUS framework that allows UEs to conditionally reuse stored system information to avoid redundant MIB/SIB1 acquisition, and support studying on-demand reference signals triggered by UL WUS for SCell operations and cell switch mobility.
Summary
This Nokia Tdoc addresses the design, feasibility, and deployment scenarios for Uplink Wake-up Signal (UL WUS) in 6G. It provides 18 proposals and 8 observations, covering signal design for different RRC states, BS receiver feasibility, and detailed operational analysis across standalone and multi-cell/carrier deployment scenarios.
Prior contributions at RAN1#124 · 1 doc · Feb 09, 2026
On Uplink WUS and corresponding operation
Position extracted by AI
Nokia proposes postponing the UL WUS and operation study on A.I. 10.6.2 to avoid duplication with the foundational PRACH and RACH procedure study on A.I. 10.5.1.2. They present a technical case that the current stage lacks clarity on what key complements UL WUS signal provides over PRACH preamble design, whether sufficient performance gain exists in coverage or energy efficiency to justify the extra design effort, and what use cases UL WUS operation covers that RACH procedure cannot. For the feasibility aspect, Nokia opposes dedicated low-power radio (LPR) receiver architecture for UL WUS at the base station, instead requiring that the UL WUS signal type be identical to other uplink signals so that common network hardware and the common radio modem at the BS side can be reused with functionalities implemented simply by a subset of existing hardware components.
Summary
This Nokia contribution presents 3 Observations and 2 Proposals regarding 6G uplink Wake-Up Signal (WUS) design. Nokia argues that PRACH/RACH procedure study (A.I. 10.5.1.2) should be prioritized before UL WUS (A.I. 10.6.2), as current understanding is insufficient to differentiate UL WUS from PRACH or identify its unique benefits. They further propose that any future UL WUS signal type should be identical to other uplink signals to enable common BS radio modem reception and minimize network operational cost.
How this was derived
The AI extracted the "position extracted" field above directly from each Tdoc during summarization.
For the delta summary at the top, the AI compared Nokia's consolidated stance at RAN1#124bis
against their stance at RAN1#124 and classified the change as
strengthened.
Always verify critical claims against the original Tdocs linked above.