Ericsson

9.1.2 strengthened

Ericsson hardened their stance on measurement inputs, moving from a compromise position supporting both sample-based and path-based measurements to explicitly opposing multi-port PDP due to doubled signaling size and marginal performance gains. They consolidated their technical case against phase information and CIR inputs, citing random initial phase issues and high signaling overhead. Additionally, they refined the monitoring framework by establishing self-monitoring as the baseline, with the inference entity responsible for metric calculation, rather than the broader label-free self-monitoring proposal from the prior meeting.

9.1.3 strengthened

Ericsson hardened its opposition to consistency enhancements by consolidating per-aspect arguments into a blanket conclusion of inapplicability. They refined their proposal by specifying the reuse of the functionality-based LCM framework and requiring the typeII-Doppler-r18' codebook format for both predicted and ground-truth CSI. They narrowed the intermediate KPI scope to SGCS only, explicitly excluding NMSE, and maintained their opposition to Type 2 monitoring.