R1-2509113 discussion

On modulation for 6G air interface

From Apple
Status: noted
WI: FS_6G_Radio
Agenda: 11.4.2
Release: Rel-20
Source: 3gpp.org ↗

Summary

This Apple contribution discusses 6G modulation design, presenting 4 Observations and 1 Proposal. It argues that higher-order QAM (4KQAM DL, 1KQAM UL) evaluation should depend on RAN4 progress due to RF impairment sensitivity, and provides preliminary simulation results comparing probability amplitude shaping (PAS) against uniform QAM across various MIMO configurations.

Position

Apple requires practical RF impairment modeling including phase noise, PA model, and IQ imbalance model for evaluating higher-order QAM. They propose that 4KQAM DL and 1KQAM UL evaluation in RAN1 should depend on RAN4 progress and request to avoid duplicate effort, noting that achieving necessary phase noise improvements for 1KQAM requires non-trivial RF power consumption increase without advanced baseband mitigation. They present a technical case that MIMO spatial layer increases using lower-order modulations provide a better trade-off between spectral efficiency and robustness than ultra-high modulation schemes. On modulation shaping, Apple presents preliminary evaluation results comparing Probability Amplitude Shaping (PAS) with CCDM against uniform QAM, showing performance varies significantly across MIMO configurations, with losses up to 2.2dB for 4x4 MIMO and gains up to 1.4dB for 4x6 MIMO.

Key proposals

Your notes

Private to your account