R1-2509114 discussion

Views on 6G energy efficiency

From Apple
Status: noted
WI: FS_6G_Radio
Agenda: 11.5
Release: Rel-20
Source: 3gpp.org ↗

Summary

This document analyzes 5G NR energy-saving features for both UE and network, identifying deployment shortfalls and backward-compatibility limitations. It presents 26 proposals and 6 observations to guide the design of 6G energy efficiency, covering evaluation models, common signal/channel design, and time/frequency domain enhancements.

Position

Apple proposes that 6G NES features must be well-justified against UE impact, citing that 5G UE power-saving features remain under-deployed due to late standardization and lack of network incentive. It supports Cat 2 BS power model as the realistic baseline, arguing Cat 1 model overestimates NES gain, and proposes updated PDSCH/PDCCH UE power scaling rules (PDSCH: 0.5+0.5*(X-20)/80; PDCCH: 0.9+0.1*(X-20)/80 for X up to 100MHz). It proposes a dual-SSB concept (always-on Type-1 for RRC_IDLE UEs and on-demand Type-2 for RRC_CONNECTED UEs) and clustered PRACH/Paging resources near SSB bursts to achieve native NES. For time-domain adaptation, Apple requires a simplified/harmonized design merging C-DRX, DCP, PDCCH skipping, SSSG switching, and LP-WUS, and proposes a two-level WUS (cell WUS + UE WUS) for joint cell DTX/DRX and C-DRX operation while opposing cell DTX/DRX for IDLE/INACTIVE UEs given clustered common signal design.

Key proposals

Your notes

Private to your account