R1-2509132 discussion

Discussion on Evaluation assumptions for 6GR air interface

From Ofinno
Status: noted
WI: FS_6G_Radio
Agenda: 11.2
Release: Rel-20
Source: 3gpp.org ↗

Summary

This document from Ofinno at RAN1#123 provides 9 Observations and 9 Proposals on evaluation assumptions for 6G radio, covering traffic model extensions (AI/ML, immersive, FTP) and NTN deployment parameters (carrier frequencies, orbits, bandwidths).

Position

Ofinno proposes that AI/ML traffic models for 6GR evaluations should follow Option-1b, transforming application-layer tokens into physical layer packets, while keeping Option-1c as a possibility depending on SA4 input. They propose extending existing XR traffic models from TR 38.838 for immersive communication services including advanced XR and haptics media services. For FTP models, they propose introducing statistically selected variable packet sizes and associating each packet with a packet delay budget that depends on packet size, arguing against unnecessarily complicating the models. For NTN evaluations, they propose specific Ku-band frequencies around 14/12 GHz based on existing 5G bands n248 and n506, and recommend both transparent and regenerative payload types. They propose a full set of satellite orbits (LEO at 300/600/1200 km, MEO with 2-3 altitudes, GEO) and specify both maximum and typical system bandwidths across L-band, S-band, Ku-band, and Ka-band.

Key proposals

Your notes

Private to your account